<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain Aging &#8211; Fact or Fiction?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2008/10/16/domain-aging-fact-or-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2008/10/16/domain-aging-fact-or-fiction/</link>
	<description>Finding the domain names of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 01:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: La valorisation des noms de domaine - l’ancienneté - acte 2 &#124; Noms Domaine</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2008/10/16/domain-aging-fact-or-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-6955</link>
		<dc:creator>La valorisation des noms de domaine - l’ancienneté - acte 2 &#124; Noms Domaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=161#comment-6955</guid>
		<description>[...] simple et avec son accord/encouragement, je vais reprendre les termes employés par Barry dans son billet (dont on pourrait traduire le titre par &#8220;Importance de l&#8217;âge du nom de domaine, mythes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] simple et avec son accord/encouragement, je vais reprendre les termes employés par Barry dans son billet (dont on pourrait traduire le titre par &#8220;Importance de l&#8217;âge du nom de domaine, mythes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cardiffgigs</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2008/10/16/domain-aging-fact-or-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-5750</link>
		<dc:creator>cardiffgigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=161#comment-5750</guid>
		<description>I agree, its about quality content, back links and careful planning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, its about quality content, back links and careful planning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Aging - Fact or Fiction? [ Predictive Domaining ]</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2008/10/16/domain-aging-fact-or-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-5746</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Aging - Fact or Fiction? [ Predictive Domaining ]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=161#comment-5746</guid>
		<description>[...] 16th 2008 10:45pm  [-] From: predictivedomaining.com  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 16th 2008 10:45pm  [-] From: predictivedomaining.com  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La valorisation des noms de domaine - l'ancienneté - acte 2 &#124; Blogodomaines, les noms de domaine vus du second marché</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2008/10/16/domain-aging-fact-or-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-5708</link>
		<dc:creator>La valorisation des noms de domaine - l'ancienneté - acte 2 &#124; Blogodomaines, les noms de domaine vus du second marché</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=161#comment-5708</guid>
		<description>[...] simple et avec son accord/encouragement, je vais reprendre les termes employés par Barry dans son billet (dont on pourrait traduire le titre par &#8220;Importance de l&#8217;âge du nom de domaine, mythes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] simple et avec son accord/encouragement, je vais reprendre les termes employés par Barry dans son billet (dont on pourrait traduire le titre par &#8220;Importance de l&#8217;âge du nom de domaine, mythes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2008/10/16/domain-aging-fact-or-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-5673</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=161#comment-5673</guid>
		<description>Cardiffgigs, thanks for the comment. PR2 with no backlinks and no content sounds like it happened quite a while ago though I suppose no algorithm is perfect. The one time I do see this still is when a domain and website with PR are sold and the new owner scraps the website. The PR is often kept until the next update. The PR updates are more dynamic though these days and are &quot;rolling&quot; updates as Matt Cutts has said. Remember this is different from toolbar PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cardiffgigs, thanks for the comment. PR2 with no backlinks and no content sounds like it happened quite a while ago though I suppose no algorithm is perfect. The one time I do see this still is when a domain and website with PR are sold and the new owner scraps the website. The PR is often kept until the next update. The PR updates are more dynamic though these days and are &#8220;rolling&#8221; updates as Matt Cutts has said. Remember this is different from toolbar PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2008/10/16/domain-aging-fact-or-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-5671</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=161#comment-5671</guid>
		<description>Remy, firstly thanks for starting the topic. I think its a topic where there is a lot of misinformation floating around. Its common for sellers in certain forums to justify high sale prices by saying they regged the domain in early 2000 for example. Go for the version 2. The more this is discussed, the more informed sellers and buyers will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remy, firstly thanks for starting the topic. I think its a topic where there is a lot of misinformation floating around. Its common for sellers in certain forums to justify high sale prices by saying they regged the domain in early 2000 for example. Go for the version 2. The more this is discussed, the more informed sellers and buyers will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2008/10/16/domain-aging-fact-or-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-5667</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=161#comment-5667</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, with a very nice presentation. Barry, you are a guy to watch in this industry.

Nice job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, with a very nice presentation. Barry, you are a guy to watch in this industry.</p>
<p>Nice job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cardiffgigs</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2008/10/16/domain-aging-fact-or-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-5661</link>
		<dc:creator>Cardiffgigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=161#comment-5661</guid>
		<description>I agree with what you have said. I had a domain name that was parked for 2 years with  no back links or any content. It achived a PR of 2. But I dropped it and was snatched by company to be later dropped again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with what you have said. I had a domain name that was parked for 2 years with  no back links or any content. It achived a PR of 2. But I dropped it and was snatched by company to be later dropped again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rémy</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2008/10/16/domain-aging-fact-or-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-5652</link>
		<dc:creator>Rémy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=161#comment-5652</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your instructive post, Barry !

It seems like I have not taken enough time to write my article and there were a some additional aspects I didn&#039;t explore. 

So I might be good for a v2 :-)

I will certainly quote your thoughts then and also some interesting discussion points that came up in some French domain forums like http://www.forumndd.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your instructive post, Barry !</p>
<p>It seems like I have not taken enough time to write my article and there were a some additional aspects I didn&#8217;t explore. </p>
<p>So I might be good for a v2 <img src='http://www.predictivedomaining.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I will certainly quote your thoughts then and also some interesting discussion points that came up in some French domain forums like <a href="http://www.forumndd.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.forumndd.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
