<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three ways to get free content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/01/27/three-ways-to-get-free-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/01/27/three-ways-to-get-free-content/</link>
	<description>Finding the domain names of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:44:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/01/27/three-ways-to-get-free-content/comment-page-1/#comment-12792</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=783#comment-12792</guid>
		<description>The problem with wiki sources is that you have to extensively rewrite the content. If you use the content as it is, it will be seen as duplicate content and the wiki will usually rank for that content and not your web page.
Also as I mentioned previously in the leaked Google spam document post, using wiki content is a signal for a spam web site if content is just lifted from the wiki and ads put on the page with no original content.
With all this in mind, I do not use wiki content and wouldn&#039;t recommend others do unless you completely rewrite it. This defeats the original purpose of the post which was to obtain original material without extensive writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with wiki sources is that you have to extensively rewrite the content. If you use the content as it is, it will be seen as duplicate content and the wiki will usually rank for that content and not your web page.<br />
Also as I mentioned previously in the leaked Google spam document post, using wiki content is a signal for a spam web site if content is just lifted from the wiki and ads put on the page with no original content.<br />
With all this in mind, I do not use wiki content and wouldn&#8217;t recommend others do unless you completely rewrite it. This defeats the original purpose of the post which was to obtain original material without extensive writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanna Develop</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/01/27/three-ways-to-get-free-content/comment-page-1/#comment-12791</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanna Develop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=783#comment-12791</guid>
		<description>That is some good advice, but, I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t mentioned any of the wiki sources :)

They are some of the best when it comes to free content... Both editorial and media.

Best,

Mike

http://www.wannadevelop.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is some good advice, but, I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t mentioned any of the wiki sources <img src='http://www.predictivedomaining.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>They are some of the best when it comes to free content&#8230; Both editorial and media.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Mike</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wannadevelop.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wannadevelop.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

