<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quality mini-sites versus MFA sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/16/quality-mini-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/16/quality-mini-websites/</link>
	<description>Finding the domain names of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:44:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/16/quality-mini-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-13124</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=924#comment-13124</guid>
		<description>Well Shucks.... Glad to be a part of some type of thought process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Shucks&#8230;. Glad to be a part of some type of thought process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/16/quality-mini-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-13114</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=924#comment-13114</guid>
		<description>Mike, 
Yes, you are right. They were put as part of the supplemental index in the past but that has since been merged with the main index. 
In effect though, they do not carry any search engine traffic and that means other strategies are needed.

Joel, Exactly. My point is that for some queries, a mini-site is all that is needed. Not every query needs a huge website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
Yes, you are right. They were put as part of the supplemental index in the past but that has since been merged with the main index.<br />
In effect though, they do not carry any search engine traffic and that means other strategies are needed.</p>
<p>Joel, Exactly. My point is that for some queries, a mini-site is all that is needed. Not every query needs a huge website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Superstar</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/16/quality-mini-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-13106</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Superstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=924#comment-13106</guid>
		<description>Your question based method of laying out the site architecture for a mini site is very good. 

The best way to make money long term with a website is to find out what visitors to your site want and then give it to them better than anyone else. 

After all, directing their searchers to the site that best gives the searcher what they want is exactly what Google or any other search engine wants to do so that they can satisfy people using their search engine and hopefully increase their market share.

Joel Ohman

http://www.DomainSuperstar.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your question based method of laying out the site architecture for a mini site is very good. </p>
<p>The best way to make money long term with a website is to find out what visitors to your site want and then give it to them better than anyone else. </p>
<p>After all, directing their searchers to the site that best gives the searcher what they want is exactly what Google or any other search engine wants to do so that they can satisfy people using their search engine and hopefully increase their market share.</p>
<p>Joel Ohman</p>
<p><a href="http://www.DomainSuperstar.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.DomainSuperstar.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wannadevelop.com</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/16/quality-mini-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-13103</link>
		<dc:creator>wannadevelop.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=924#comment-13103</guid>
		<description>A lot of parked pages are in fact indexed by the search engines but they are penalized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of parked pages are in fact indexed by the search engines but they are penalized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/16/quality-mini-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-13101</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=924#comment-13101</guid>
		<description>OK. Well that wasn&#039;t the assumption. I assumed that the mini-website needs to be indexed. Parking landing pages are not indexed and you could create a mini-website that acts in the same way as a parking page. Sounds like another blog post in the making ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. Well that wasn&#8217;t the assumption. I assumed that the mini-website needs to be indexed. Parking landing pages are not indexed and you could create a mini-website that acts in the same way as a parking page. Sounds like another blog post in the making <img src='http://www.predictivedomaining.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wannadevelop.com</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/16/quality-mini-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-13100</link>
		<dc:creator>wannadevelop.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=924#comment-13100</guid>
		<description>&quot;....not mind readers&quot;

Well, Google is as close to a &quot;mind reader&quot; as it gets ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;.not mind readers&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, Google is as close to a &#8220;mind reader&#8221; as it gets <img src='http://www.predictivedomaining.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/16/quality-mini-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-13098</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=924#comment-13098</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,
I agree with what you have said. However I made one crucial assumption when writing this post. I wonder if anyone can spot it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,<br />
I agree with what you have said. However I made one crucial assumption when writing this post. I wonder if anyone can spot it. <img src='http://www.predictivedomaining.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wannadevelop.com</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/16/quality-mini-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-13096</link>
		<dc:creator>wannadevelop.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=924#comment-13096</guid>
		<description>Barry, good analysis.. As always :)

Most of the mini-site services out there, that are offered towards the domainers crowd, fail both SEARCH ENGINE quality tests and the USABILITY from a users perspective.

A good site is one that provides custom and unique relevant information. It can be a few paragraphs... It can be a few pages... It can be a few links. 

The definition of mini-site can be 1 page to you, 10 pages to me.. Ask somebody else and they will tell you 5 pages.. 

The definition of quality of one site may be A+ to me.. To you B- and to other people it may suck..

Worrying about this stuff too much is rather pointless, but there are certain rules and guidelines to follow when launching any type of site. Small or large.

Follow those basics....and you shall succeed.

It&#039;s simple!

Keep up the good work with the posts.

I enjoy reading your blog..

All the best,

Mike from NY

www.WannaDevelop.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry, good analysis.. As always <img src='http://www.predictivedomaining.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Most of the mini-site services out there, that are offered towards the domainers crowd, fail both SEARCH ENGINE quality tests and the USABILITY from a users perspective.</p>
<p>A good site is one that provides custom and unique relevant information. It can be a few paragraphs&#8230; It can be a few pages&#8230; It can be a few links. </p>
<p>The definition of mini-site can be 1 page to you, 10 pages to me.. Ask somebody else and they will tell you 5 pages.. </p>
<p>The definition of quality of one site may be A+ to me.. To you B- and to other people it may suck..</p>
<p>Worrying about this stuff too much is rather pointless, but there are certain rules and guidelines to follow when launching any type of site. Small or large.</p>
<p>Follow those basics&#8230;.and you shall succeed.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simple!</p>
<p>Keep up the good work with the posts.</p>
<p>I enjoy reading your blog..</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>Mike from NY</p>
<p><a href="http://www.WannaDevelop.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.WannaDevelop.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

