<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Predictive Domaining &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.predictivedomaining.com/tag/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com</link>
	<description>Finding the domain names of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 01:59:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why I rarely build forums</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/24/rarely-build-forums/</link>
		<comments>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/24/rarely-build-forums/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selling domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=1041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forums are a legitimate way to develop a domain but I rarely use them. Proponents argue that the content is created by users and it brings life to a website. This is true but does that outweigh the negative aspects of forums? In my experience, forums are rarely worth developing except in certain cases. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/24/rarely-build-forums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google compounds their mistake by blaming their partner</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/04/google-compounds-their-mistake-by-blaming-their-partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/04/google-compounds-their-mistake-by-blaming-their-partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you probably already know from reading the blog, I am a fan of a number of the tools Google produces and watch closely to see what will be next in their lab. However the mess they made on Saturday, labeling every search results with &#8220;This site may be harm your computer&#8221; was really quite [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/02/04/google-compounds-their-mistake-by-blaming-their-partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google looks at spam 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/01/27/google-looks-at-spam-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/01/27/google-looks-at-spam-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In November 2008 a large source of the world&#8217;s spam, the McColo network, was taken offline. Spam levels dropped 70% but while spam is still down overall, it&#8217;s important to note its rate of growth. Spam levels are up by 156% since November 2008. Google enterprise blog looks at spam 2008. In fact Google estimates [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/01/27/google-looks-at-spam-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is a spam website according to Google?</title>
		<link>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/01/22/what-is-a-spam-website-according-to-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/01/22/what-is-a-spam-website-according-to-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictivedomaining.com/?p=761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a second post analyzing a Google document from 2007 entitled “Google Guidelines For Quality Raters”which somehow found its way onto the Internet. In second half of this document, some common examples of spam websites are described. Understanding the signs of spam websites will help you avoid problems as you develop your websites. Webspam [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.predictivedomaining.com/2009/01/22/what-is-a-spam-website-according-to-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

